A just-released report, authored by the Reinvestment Fund and funded by a grant from the Abell Foundation, examined newly available public data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) to analyze potential racial bias in home appraisals in the Baltimore metropolitan area during 2013-2022. The report found that neighborhoods with larger non-white populations tend to have a higher percentage of homes with appraised values that are lower than the contract sale price than what is observed in predominantly white neighborhoods. Conversely, predominantly white, non-Hispanic neighborhoods tend to experience a higher percentage of homes with appraised values that exceed the contract price.
While these racial differences in appraisal accuracy have lessened somewhat in recent years, negative patterns are continuing. Analysis of the public appraisal data suggests the presence of systematic appraisal bias that undervalues homes in predominantly Black communities in Baltimore City and the surrounding counties. Key observations from the neighborhood level analysis are:
• Neighborhoods with a predominant percentage of residents who are not-white, not-Hispanic tend to have higher rates of under-appraising than neighborhoods that are predominantly white, not-Hispanic.
• Neighborhoods with a predominant percentage of residents who are not-white, not-Hispanic tend to have lower rates of over-appraising than areas that are predominantly white, not-Hispanic.
• Between 2018 and 2022, these patterns show signs of improvement, but they remain observable in the data.
It is important to consider that the available federal and local data are limited because a disproportionate share of appraisals regarding Black borrowers is excluded, meaning that any evidence it provides of racial bias in appraisals potentially understates the problem.
The report also provides a summary of policies Maryland could institute to reduce the impact of appraisal bias. Among the recommendations of the Maryland’s Task Force on Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity in late 2024 were: (1) Institute a reconsideration of value process in Maryland modeled after one used by the Department of Veterans Affairs which allows lenders or other interested parties to provide relevant information to an appraiser before a valuation is made and requires appraisers to contact the requester of the appraisal for additional information in cases where the appraised value appears likely to be lower than the agreed sales price; (2) Require timely reporting of sales of newly constructed residential properties to ensure that the comparable sales appraisers use to determine value reflect changes in communities; (3) Create a unit within the state government to provide a third-party review in cases where the reconsideration of value process is insufficient; and (4) Remove barriers to entry to the appraisal profession for minorities.
One recent example of this problem is that in March 2024, a Black couple - both professors at Johns Hopkins University - who claimed mortgage lender loanDepot denied a refinancing of their mortgage because it relied upon a racially biased, considerably low appraisal of their Baltimore home agreed to a legal settlement in which the lender vowed to change how it handles complaints of racially biased appraisals. The settlement filed in the U.S. District Court for Maryland also includes an undisclosed financial amount for the couple. It does not include any admission of liability or facts by loanDepot nor does it resolve complaints against the independent appraiser, who has denied liability and countersued for defamation.
