| |||||||||||
|
Info about Fair Housing in Maryland - including housing discrimination, hate crimes, affordable housing, disabilities, segregation, mortgage lending, & others. http://www.gbchrb.org. 443.347.3701.
| |||||||||||
|
The National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) with the civil rights firm Relman Colfax PLLC will hold a free webinar entitled "CRA and Race: How can the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) be updated to directly examine race and better combat redlining?"
The webinar will be held on Wednesday, December 15 at 1:00 pm ET. Register now.
The Community Reinvestment Act was enacted to ensure much-needed investment and capital makes it to low- and moderate-income communities. But NCRC's research has shown that the majority of communities that were redlined in the 20th Century are still lower-income and also predominantly communities of color. Redlining was a practice rooted in racism, and the only way to combat and reverse the impact of redlining is to address race directly.
Recently, NCRC and Relman Colfax PLLC have released a report calling on federal regulators to add race to the scope of CRA and finally hold banks accountable to the communities they serve.
NCRC and Relman Colfax are teaming up again to host the upcoming webinar, CRA and Race: How can the Community Reinvestment Act be updated to directly examine race and better combat redlining?
Speakers include: (1) Dedrick Asante Muhammad, Chief of Membership, Policy & Equity, NCRC; (2) Brad Blower, General Counsel, NCRC; and (3) Glenn Schlactus, Partner, Relman Colfax PLLC.
Register now to make sure you don’t miss this important discussion with NCRC leadership and the authors of the report.
*****
Source: NCRC release, December 3, 2021.
The discriminatory practice of redlining first targeted neighborhoods with immigrants and people of color. These were labeled “red” and designated “hazardous” by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, and banks, realtors and public officials used those maps to deny loans and other investments in those neighborhoods.
Despite being outlawed more than fifty years ago, redlining policies continue to affect these communities today, especially Black populations living in inner-city communities. Over time, this disinvestment has led to housing instability and poor health rates in these communities, which, in turn, led to adverse effects on Black maternal health and birthing outcomes, which persist today.
Neighborhoods that were once redlined continue to show increased risk of preterm birth rates in Black mothers. Historic and continued housing instability there have been linked to maternal health complications, including hypertension and other neonatal risks. The JAMA Open Network found that preterm births in once redlined zip codes occurred at a rate 1.5 times greater than elsewhere. The legacy of redlining has contributed to racial health inequality and increased risk of preterm births and other complications for Black mothers.
Redlining’s contribution to housing instability has also led to overrepresentation of Black people among the homeless population, thus significantly increasing the risks for Black maternal health and birthing outcomes.
Housing instability can also precede gentrification, where rising housing and rent prices force residents to vacate their homes to be replaced by wealthier and usually Whiter residents. The attendant tensions may lead to high-stress environments that also increases the chances of a premature birth, among other negative effects.
Premature births are associated with numerous negative health conditions including both short- and long-term cardiovascular issues and social and behavioral issues. Because the US healthcare system continues to not serve Black communities well, health inequities persist over time.
There has been some progress in improving Black maternal health. In 1977, the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) was designed to combat the effects of redlining by encouraging investments in underserved communities. The reality is that the subsequent funded projects have not appreciably improved Black maternal health, or health equity in general.
To counter the decades of disinvestment and address Black maternal health outcomes, hospitals and health systems should continue to partner with banks under the Community Reinvestment Act to foster low-income and minority group health equity. The increased investment in maternal healthcare centers, neonatal care units, and other vital health services, would hopefully improve health outcomes while also combatting the legacy of redlining. Additionally, modernizing the Community Reinvestment Act to increase support for inclusionary zoning and other affordable housing efforts could potentially promote the reduction of poverty in redlined communities, therefore creating an upstream effect for Black maternal health outcomes.
*****
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
October 29, 2021
FULL REPORT (PDF)
FULL REPORT (DOC)
SCOPE AND PURPOSE
On October 29, the National Council on Disability (NCD) released, 2021 Progress Report: The Impact of COVID-19 on People with Disabilities. This report was developed through a cooperative agreement with the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, in which the Bazelon center was a partner. Download 2021 Progress Report: The Impact of COVID-19 on People with Disabilities here.
This report examines COVID-19’s disproportionate negative impact on people with disabilities in (1) accessing healthcare; (2) accessing direct care support; (3) congregate care settings and transition; (4) education; (5) employment; (6) effective communication; (7) mental health and suicide prevention services; and summarizes the federal and state response to these impacts. The purpose of the report is to document the difference that disability made to one’s experiences and outcomes in the US during the pandemic.
Until very recently, federal and state healthcare data collection practices did not gather basic information about the functional disability status of patients and the public. This left people with disabilities uncounted during and after public health emergencies. Throughout this study, NCD found that this data dearth created barriers in collecting real-time accurate data about the impact of COVID-19 on people with disabilities or the healthcare disparities they experienced during the pandemic. This study makes recommendations to policy makers on ways to improve data collection on people with disabilities and their experiences that will allow for a nuanced look at how disability creates a unique difference to health disparities.
KEY FINDINGS
NCD found that COVID-19 exacted a steep toll on certain populations of people with disabilities, and the events that unfolded during the pandemic, including measures to mitigate the spread, posed unique problems and barriers to people with disabilities in each of the report’s seven areas of focus. Key findings include:
Click here to read the recommendations regarding healthcare, congregate care facilities, education, employment, effective communication, and mental health and suicide prevention.
*****
Source: Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, "The Monthly Briefing: November 2021."
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
|